Ruby Law — Insights

Legal intelligence
for decision-makers.

Analysis of Canadian corporate and commercial law — written by lawyers, built for the people running the company.

When Do Canadian Startups Need a Shareholders Agreement?
Featured
Corporate Governance7 min read

When Do Canadian Startups Need a Shareholders Agreement?

The day you issue shares to a second person, you need a shareholders agreement. Without one, the OBCA and CBCA defaults govern your company — and those defaults rarely favour founders. We walk through the five trigger events that make a SHA non-negotiable, the provisions that protect minority and majority shareholders differently, and the specific clauses Canadian investors expect to see before writing a cheque.

RL

Ruby Law

Canadian Legal Insights

Employee vs. Contractor in Canada: How Misclassification Exposes Your Startup
Employment Law
9 min read

Employee vs. Contractor in Canada: How Misclassification Exposes Your Startup

The Supreme Court of Canada's Sagaz test and the CRA's Wiebe Door factors determine whether a worker is an employee or independent contractor — and getting it wrong triggers retroactive CPP, EI, and income tax liability, plus wrongful dismissal exposure. We break down each factor, explain the "dependent contractor" middle ground that catches most startups off guard, and show exactly how to structure each relationship from day one.

RL
Ruby Law
Read →
The Pre-Seed Legal Stack: What Canadian Founders Need Before Hiring
Startup Strategy
6 min read

The Pre-Seed Legal Stack: What Canadian Founders Need Before Hiring

Incorporation is step one — not the finish line. Before your first hire, your first investor conversation, or your first customer contract, you need a minimum legal infrastructure that protects your IP, establishes founder equity terms, and satisfies the due diligence any serious angel or fund will run. Here is the exact document stack, in priority order, that every Canadian pre-seed company should have in place.

RL
Ruby Law
Read →
SAFEs and Convertible Notes in Canada: What Changes North of the Border
Financing
10 min read

SAFEs and Convertible Notes in Canada: What Changes North of the Border

Y Combinator's SAFE was designed for Delaware law, US accredited investor rules, and IRC Section 1202. When you raise on a SAFE or convertible note in Canada, the securities exemptions change (NI 45-106), the tax treatment changes (no QSBS equivalent, but LCGE under s.110.6 applies to CCPC shares), and the conversion mechanics must account for OBCA or CBCA share structures. We cover the specific adaptations Canadian founders and their lawyers need to make.

RL
Ruby Law
Read →

More articles

Employment Law8 min read

Non-Competes After Ontario's Working for Workers Act: What Still Works

Ontario's Working for Workers Act, 2021 banned non-competition clauses for most employees, with a narrow executive exception. But the restriction only applies to employment — not to shareholder agreements, asset purchase agreements, or partnership exits. We explain the exact scope of the ban, what the executive carve-out requires, and the three alternative restraints (non-solicitation, garden leave, and IP assignment) that remain fully enforceable across Canada.

Privacy & Data8 min read

PIPEDA Compliance for SaaS Companies: A Practical Roadmap

If your SaaS product collects, uses, or discloses personal information from anyone in Canada, PIPEDA's ten fair information principles apply to you. With mandatory breach reporting under PIPEDA s.10.1 and the OPC's increasingly active enforcement posture, non-compliance is no longer a theoretical risk. We provide a concrete implementation roadmap — from consent mechanisms and privacy impact assessments to cross-border data transfer safeguards and the DPA your enterprise customers will demand.

Financing11 min read

Series A Legal Readiness: The Checklist Institutional Investors Expect

Institutional VCs run legal due diligence before issuing a term sheet — not after. If your cap table is messy, your employment agreements pre-date Waksdale, or your IP assignment chain has gaps, the deal slows down or dies. This checklist covers the governance documents, compliance items, employment infrastructure, and IP chain-of-title work that Canadian startups need completed before a lead investor engages.

Corporate Governance9 min read

Structuring Founder Equity in Canada: Vesting, Lock-Ups, and Buy-Sell Mechanisms

Co-founder separations happen in roughly 65% of startups. Without a vesting schedule, a lock-up agreement, and a clear buy-sell mechanism, a departing co-founder can walk away with a full equity stake and no obligation to the company. We explain how reverse vesting works under Canadian corporate law, when a lock-up agreement adds protection beyond a SHA, and how shotgun (Russian roulette) clauses function as a last-resort deadlock breaker.

Intellectual Property7 min read

Why Section 13 of the Copyright Act Is a Trap for Canadian Startups

Under the Canadian Copyright Act, s.13(3) gives employers ownership of work created by employees in the course of employment — but only if there is an employment relationship and only for copyright, not patents or trade secrets. Independent contractors retain full ownership by default. And "course of employment" is narrower than most founders assume. A proper IP assignment agreement is the only reliable way to ensure your company owns what it paid for.

Employment Law8 min read

Waksdale v. Swegon: Why Pre-2020 Employment Agreements Are Likely Unenforceable

In June 2020, the Ontario Court of Appeal held in Waksdale v. Swegon that if any part of a termination clause is unenforceable — even a just cause provision the employer never relied on — the entire termination scheme fails, and the employee gets common law reasonable notice. The decision invalidated thousands of employment agreements across Ontario overnight. If your termination clauses were drafted before Waksdale, they almost certainly need to be rewritten.

Privacy & Data7 min read

Quebec Law 25: Canada's Strictest Privacy Regime and What It Means for Your Business

Quebec's Act to modernize legislative provisions as regards the protection of personal information (Law 25) phased in between September 2022 and September 2024, creating privacy obligations that exceed PIPEDA in several important ways — including mandatory privacy impact assessments, a designated privacy officer, consent granularity requirements, and the right to data portability. If you have Quebec users or do business in the province, your privacy infrastructure needs specific updates.

Employment Law8 min read

The Sagaz Test Explained: How Canadian Courts Classify Your Workers

In 671122 Ontario Ltd v. Sagaz Industries Canada Inc., the Supreme Court of Canada established the central question for contractor classification: whose business is it? The four-factor test — control, ownership of tools, chance of profit, and risk of loss — plus the "integration" analysis determines whether your contractor is truly independent or a dependent contractor entitled to reasonable notice on termination. We break down each factor with modern examples relevant to tech startups.

Corporate Governance8 min read

Board of Directors Basics for CBCA Companies: What Early-Stage Founders Need to Know

Under the CBCA, a distributing corporation must have at least three directors, with a minimum of two being non-officers — but private companies can operate with as few as one. Understanding your fiduciary duties under CBCA s.122, the duty of care standard set in Peoples Department Stores v. Wise, and how board composition changes as you take on institutional investors is critical from incorporation through Series A. We cover board structure, meeting requirements, officer appointments, and the indemnification provisions that protect directors who act in good faith.

Corporate Governance10 min read

ESOP and Stock Option Plans Under Canadian Tax Rules: Section 7 ITA Explained

Employee stock options in Canada are governed by s.7 of the Income Tax Act, which determines when the taxable benefit arises and whether the employee qualifies for the s.110(1)(d) deduction that effectively halves the tax rate on the benefit. For CCPCs, the tax event is deferred until disposition of the shares rather than exercise — a significant advantage over non-CCPC treatment. We walk through the qualification criteria, the $200,000 annual vesting limit introduced in 2021 for non-CCPC options, and how to structure your option plan to maximize the tax benefit for your team.

Intellectual Property7 min read

NDA Enforcement in Canada: What Courts Actually Uphold

Canadian courts routinely decline to enforce confidentiality agreements that are overbroad in scope, indefinite in duration, or that attempt to protect information that does not meet the legal threshold for a trade secret under the common law framework established in Lac Minerals v. International Corona Resources. An enforceable NDA requires precise definitions of confidential information, reasonable time limits, clear carve-outs for publicly available information, and obligations that are proportionate to the legitimate business interest being protected. We break down the drafting principles that separate enforceable NDAs from unenforceable boilerplate.

Startup Strategy8 min read

OBCA vs. CBCA Incorporation: Choosing the Right Statute for Your Startup

Ontario-based founders face an immediate incorporation decision: the provincial OBCA or the federal CBCA. The differences are not trivial. The CBCA requires a 25% Canadian residency requirement for directors (compared to zero under the OBCA since Ontario eliminated its residency requirement), offers name protection across Canada, and provides access to the federal oppression remedy under s.241. The OBCA is simpler for single-province operations and avoids the dual filing obligation. We compare costs, director requirements, extra-provincial registration obligations, and the practical implications for raising capital.

Employment Law9 min read

Drafting Enforceable Termination Clauses After Waksdale: A Practical Guide

After the Ontario Court of Appeal's decision in Waksdale v. Swegon — and its progeny including Henderson v. Slavkin, Rahman v. Cannon Design, and Bertsch v. Datastealth — the standard for enforceable termination provisions is higher than ever. Every clause in the termination section must independently comply with the ESA, including for cause provisions, without cause provisions, and resignation terms. A single subclause that could theoretically permit a payment below ESA minimums voids the entire termination scheme. We provide a clause-by-clause drafting framework that reflects the current state of Ontario employment law.

Employment Law11 min read

Hiring US Remote Workers from a Canadian Company: Tax, Employment, and Compliance

When a Canadian startup hires remote employees based in the United States, it potentially creates a permanent establishment for tax purposes, triggers state-level employment law obligations, and may require registration as a foreign employer with the IRS and relevant state agencies. The Canada-US Tax Treaty determines whether your company has a taxable presence, but individual state nexus rules add another layer of complexity. We cover the three common structures — direct employment, employer of record, and independent contractor — and the legal and tax trade-offs of each approach.

Corporate Governance10 min read

The Oppression Remedy Under CBCA s.241: A Founder's Guide to Shareholder Disputes

The oppression remedy under CBCA s.241 is the most flexible and powerful shareholder remedy in Canadian corporate law. It allows any "complainant" — including shareholders, creditors, directors, and officers — to seek relief where the corporation's conduct is oppressive, unfairly prejudicial, or unfairly disregards their interests. Following BCE Inc. v. 1976 Debentureholders, courts apply a two-part test: identify the complainant's reasonable expectations, then determine whether the conduct complained of constitutes a departure from those expectations. We explain how founders can both use and defend against oppression claims.

Financing9 min read

Pre-Money vs. Post-Money SAFEs in the Canadian Context: Cap Table Implications

Y Combinator's shift from pre-money to post-money SAFEs in 2018 changed how dilution is allocated between founders and SAFE holders at conversion. Under a post-money SAFE, the investor's ownership percentage at conversion is calculable from day one — but this means all dilution from subsequent SAFEs falls on the founders, not on existing SAFE holders. In Canada, the interaction between SAFE conversion mechanics and CBCA share class restrictions, the LCGE under s.110.6 of the ITA, and provincial securities exemptions under NI 45-106 creates additional structuring considerations that founders need to understand before signing.

Browse by practice area

Six areas of Canadian law

Stay informed

Legal updates for executives

One article per week. No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.

Ready to draft?

Turn insight into signed agreements.

Every article maps to a production-ready legal document you can generate in minutes.